Desire to Gather

Desire to Gather: A Sermon on Luke 13

First Parish Church, Weston Sunday Feb 24, 2013

31 At that very hour some Pharisees came and said to him, ‘Get away from here, for Herod wants to kill you.’ 32He said to them, ‘Go and tell that fox for me,* “Listen, I am casting out demons and performing cures today and tomorrow, and on the third day I finish my work. 33Yet today, tomorrow, and the next day I must be on my way, because it is impossible for a prophet to be killed away from Jerusalem.” 34Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often have I desired to gather your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing! 35See, your house is left to you. And I tell you, you will not see me until the time comes when* you say, “Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord.” ’ ~ Luke 13:31-35

The name is misleading: Sempervivum. Sempervivum, “always living.” Except they die. These plants that we often know by the name “Hens & Chicks” really only live for three seasons. Eternal life that’s not quite. The main succulent plant, the “hen” sends off ‘chicks’ loosely attached to the mother plant. Do you have these in your yard? But after three seasons, the ‘hen’ plant sends up a center stalk that blooms, and the plant dies. It can’t be stopped. Blooms and dies. And the baby chick plant lives on: Sempervivum. “How I have desired to gather your children as a hen gathers her brood.” Let us pray….

Jerusalem is not very far from here. Each week we creep closer. The arch of Lent, from quiet darkness of Ash Wednesday to the glaring parade of Palm Sunday moves us closer. “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets.” Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city feels like almost every time it is in the news there is conflict and strife. But it’s magnetic. It’s contested. It’s a draw to pilgrims and prophets.  It’s the center of the universe for the writer of Luke and Acts. Luke’s Gospel begins in Jerusalem, with Zechariah at the temple praying for descendants.  The boy child Jesus returns to Jerusalem to preach in the temple.  Later in Acts, Stephen and James will be martyred in Jerusalem. “All told, Luke mentions Jerusalem 90 times in his Gospel, while all the other New Testament writers combined mention it only 49 times. “ Jerusalem, the start of Jesus’ prophetic ministry; Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets who have come before, and this one too… Back through the history of the Jewish people we learn in Deuteronomy 12:5, Jerusalem, after all, is “the place that the Lord your God will choose out of all your tribes as his habitation to put his name there” Jerusalem is thick with meaning, but fickle and unfaithful.  Attractive, magnetic, infuriating Jerusalem.

And there, in Jerusalem, before his time has come, Jesus is warned off by some of the Pharisees: Herod Antipas is gunning for you. But Jesus will have none of it. He knows his death is coming. He does not treat it as a separate event, but part and parcel of his ministry: today, tomorrow and the next day. He’s still got work to do, healing to accomplish.  He tells Herod the fox to buzz off.  Suddenly, Jesus’ defiant tone turns to mourning. “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it. How often have I desired to gather your children as a hen gathers her brood under her wings and you are not willing.”

Maybe it’s anger. More likely it’s lament as Jesus sighs, “Oh Jerusalem, Jerusalem.” Barbara Brown Taylor writes, “If you have ever loved someone you could not protect, then you understand the depth of Jesus’ lament. All you can do is open your arms. You cannot make anyone walk into them. Meanwhile, this is the most vulnerable posture in the world –wings spread, breast exposed — but if you mean what you say, then this is how you stand.” How I have desired to gather you, says our God.

From May to September 2012, two Boston Globe reporters Meghan E. Irons and Akilah Johnson lived on Mount Ida Street in the Bowdoin-Geneva section of Dorchester. With other reporters, photographers, videographers and data visualization specialists, they attempted to understand this 68 block neighborhood with a murder rate four times the city average. Nate and Trina Davis have already had their youngest, their 14 year old son Nicholas shot dead a block from their house, when their eldest son was arrested for gun possession. Big Nate is tall, large. He’s lived in Bowdoin-Geneva for 40 years. Little Nate is reduced to a voice on the end of the phone line calling from jail. Little Nate was bound for college.  Unseen by their child, Big Nate and Trina stand in their dining room talking to a cordless phone, Trina still in her pink hospital scrubs. They stand with their arms open. How I desire to gather you.

Sometimes the streets of Jerusalem run through Bowdoin-Geneva. Sometimes they run through Weston as we long to gather. The invitation of Lent is to return to God’s open arms, to allow the Holy Comforter to gather up the broken bits of our lives. Jesus grieves not his impending death but the broken relationship with Jerusalem. The Jesus who wearily opens his arms to Jerusalem is the same Jesus who knows our grief as we try to gather up the scattered parts of our lives- a child led astray, a loved one who drinks, an unfaithful spouse, a broken relationship, bodies that will not do as we command. Jesus knows our love for the ones we can’t protect. How I have desired to gather you, says our God.

This is the story of our lives as people guided by Scripture. The story of Scripture is the story of God’s opening arms to a scattered people who are unwilling to be gathered. It’s not just others, we too resist being gathered in. We have many good excuses for staying separated from our God and one another: Our American exceptionalism. Our Yankee independence. Our town lines. Our sports rivalries. Our class divide. Our perceived self-sufficiency. Our denominational particularity. Our very full schedules. How often God desires to gather us and we scatter like chickens. Jesus prays that his followers may all be one, and we’ve created thousands of denominations. We can tell the story of the Church as a story of scattering chickens. But Scripture gives us our story of God’s steady desire and our tendency, generation after generation, to scatter. Lent is the season to examine the scattered bits of our life and place them before God.

Amid his grief over temperamental Jerusalem, Jesus chooses as delicious image to express his love: a chicken, or more accurately a hen. I fear I can’t say anything especially wise about chickens. I live in the city. The closest experience I have to chickens is when one of the neighbors seemed to have some illegal roosters for cock-fighting that started crowing before the hum of the MBTA busses and my alarm. We need our farmers to lead us here. But, we do not need to know much of anything about chickens to notice Jesus’ odd choice for this analogy.  To Herod’s coercive power like a fox, Jesus counters with the gender-bending, open winged image of a hen.

There was in fact a woman named ‘Mother Hen;” not of a fairy tale but on the path to sainthood in the Roman Catholic Church.  Venerable Mother Henriette DeLille was born in 1813 in New Orleans to a French father Jean-Baptiste Lille Sarpy and her mother, Marie-Josèphe “Pouponne” Díaz, who would have been called at the time “a free quadroon” or a ‘Creole of color.’ Mother Henriette was the child of their common-law marriage or ‘left-handed marriage,’ typical between wealthy white men and Creole women. Henriette grew up well educated, speaking French, attending quadroon balls, being groomed for the same arrangement. Yet, her faith was stronger than the social & familial expectations. When there was no religious life possible for women from her background, she founded the Roman Catholic order of the Sisters of the Holy Family in New Orleans, inviting in free women of color. When the Church would not gather these women, Mother Henriette took on the open armed posture of Christ, the mother hen.

Today, on the Mount of Olives, overlooking Jerusalem, there is a small church named “Dominus Flevit,” or translated from the Latin, “the Lord wept.” The 1950’s architect of the church shaped it like a teardrop. But beneath the contemporary church, the patch of earth where Jesus wept was also a Canaanite burial site and Byzantine monastery, and later on a 16th c mosque. Behind the contemporary altar, a window shows not some stained glass image of the New Jerusalem to come, but clear glass allows the worshippers to look upon that very same Jerusalem for whom Jesus wept.

In front of the altar stands a mosaic of a hen with wings outstretched. The words from Luke ring the top of the Mosaic, “How I desired to gather you….” And even tucked under the feet of the hen and her chicks remain the words “et noluistis” (“and you would not”) in the pool of red under the chicks. Even still, the wings of the outstretched hen embrace the promise to gather even those who would scatter. That is the promise of Lent. May it you receive the invitation this day from Our God to gather again. Amen.

Hungry: When We Can’t Feast at the Same Table

Over the course of the last weekend, I sat through approximately 9 hours of liturgy before I could receive communion: 3hrs for a Roman Catholic bishop ordination, 3 hrs for Armenian Christmas Eve, 3 hrs of Orthodox divine liturgy. By the time I rolled to my own church on Sunday evening, I was hungry.Hungry

I’ve gone for days before without receiving communion- why was last weekend so hard? I’ve experienced “ecumenical awkwardness” before, but this was different. It wasn’t awkward. It was painful. Through all those other liturgies, I watched faithful brothers and sisters step forward, a line of hungry people poised to receive the life-giving elements. I wanted what they had. I wanted to feast with them. I was present and visible at all those services as a sign of the wider Church, and yet again, could not fully participate as a sign of that wider Church. And in full disclosure, I was a bit worn from the holidays and needing spiritual nourishment myself. I was hungry and could not eat.  

When I visit congregations and ask parishioners when they feel the divisions of the Church, invariably someone speaks about the pain of being unable to receive Communion, most often at a funeral, wedding, or baptism. This happens far more often than we worship leaders think; our congregations are less homogenous that we imagine. How would we change if we expected guests who could not receive at every celebration? In both the Roman Catholic and Orthodox settings, my hosts took steps to acknowledge this division and care pastorally for those who could not receive. I commend these options to you.

The service bulletin for the Roman Catholic ordination included “Guidelines for Reception” for Catholics, “our fellow Christians,” “for those not receiving communion,” and “for non-Christians.”  An excerpt from the paragraph “For our fellow Christians:”

“We welcome our fellow Christians to this celebration of the Eucharist as our brothers and sisters. We pray that our common baptism and the action of the Holy Spirit in this Eucharist will draw us closer to one another and begin to dispel the sad divisions that separate us. We pray that these will lessen and finally disappear, in keeping with Christ’s prayer for us ‘that they may all be  one’ (Jn 17:21). Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life and worship, members of those churches with home we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to Holy Communion….”

The Guidelines go one to delineate the churches with whom Eucharistic sharing is a possibility. The printed guidelines also serve as a reminder for all who can receive that there are others worshipping with them who cannot.

In the Armenian Orthodox setting, as an ecumenical representative I was seated near the altar with the retired clergy who were present but not presiding. The presiding priest sent a deacon to us with “blessed bread” or “mas.” The blessed bread is distributed “in order that the faithful, who have not received the sacrament, should not be deprived of the blessing, but should have a sense of sharing in the Divine feast.” While this practice is not necessarily an option for all churches, every church can have its leadership be attentive to visible and less visible guests who cannot receive.

Most of the Protestant churches I visit are very explicit and expansive in their welcome to ‘eucharistic hospitality.’ And yet, as wide open as these churches can be to invite others to the table, not all are able to receive that invitation because of the directives of their home churches. Just because we invite doesn’t mean that all can attend. There is still plenty of reason to include a written or oral prayer that invites all to pray for the day when everyone can feast at Christ’s table.

At my ordination, we knew that there would be many Christians and people of other faiths in attendance who could not receive Communion. We included this in the bulletin:

Holy Communion is a sacrament of the Church throughout the ages. We invite our interfaith friends to observe our sacrament and pray that we may grow to understand one another’s unique traditions better. This congregation practices an “open table” where all are invited to receive the elements. Yet we know that our churches remain divided around this sacrament. We invite those Christians unable to receive today to pray for the conviction and work we must do so all can come to Christ’s table.

“O God, Holy Trinity, whose diversity reflects the nature of your unity, we give thanks that we can come together in your presence in our diversity, sharing in this unity through our baptism. And yet, our unity is incomplete. This is painfully obvious on this day when some are able to receive the bread of life, while others are deprived of this spiritual food because of the remaining divisions among our churches. As we celebrate this sacrament of unity, may our inability to offer hospitality at your holy table impel us all to respond with renewed vigour to the prayer of our Lord “that they may all be one… so that the world may believe… We pray this in the name of the One who calls us to be one, our Lord Jesus Christ, Amen.”

~ prayer from Receive One Another: Hospitality in Ecumenical Perspective, Editor: Diane C. Kessler. This book project was initiated by the Massachusetts Council of Churches and printed by the World Council of Churches in 2005.

Maybe we should remain hungry.

Panelist: Domenico Bettinelli, Jr.

In advance of the Massachusetts Council of Churches Annual Meeting on Saturday April 28 at the Wellesley Hills Congregational Church we’re highlighting our fabulous panelists and workshop leaders. You can register “Christian Unity in the Digital Age” here: http://www.eventbrite.com/event/2934937477

Today, we’re featuring Domenico Bettinelli, Jr.,Creative Director of the Pilot New Media Group for the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston. Domenico will be on the panel with UUA pastor Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein (aka PeaceBang) and Lutheran pastor Rev. Keith Anderson.

I first met Domenico at a meeting I set up at the Archdiocese of Boston Pastoral Center. I had asked for this meeting with Domenico and his colleague Scot Landry after I read about Pilot New Media on Cardinal Sean O’Malley’s blog.  What a joy to meet the folks on the other end of the Facebook pages I kept tagging! At the Massachusetts Council of Churches, we were in the early stages of our push into new media and I was consistently impressed by how my Catholic colleagues were using these tools. Specifically, I was amazed by how Cardinal Sean’s blog invited the local faithful to a better understanding of what a Cardinal does, where he goes and who he meets with! I believe the blog began in Sept 2006 as a way to chronicle a World Youth Day pilgrimage. It was the first personal blog for a Cardinal.  Sometime episcopal leadership can be perceived as inaccessible, but Cardinal Sean’s blog was a fascinating move to tell a story about life in the Archdiocese. Domenico and his colleagues are working across many platforms: Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Flicker,YouTube, blogs, podcasts, and parish websites. In many ways, they are way ahead of other diocese, synods and other mid-level judicatories. But Domenico has been thinking about how the Church can use social media authentically for a long time. I believe Domenico’s insights about how a large Christian institution can embrace social media will be a great contribution to the panel discussion. Join us on Saturday 4/28 to hear Domenico speak and register here: http://www.eventbrite.com/event/2934937477

Domenico Bettinelli, Jr.

Creative Director, Pilot New Media Group of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston

Work: http://www.pilotnewmedia.com  (Official) @BostonCatholic (twitter), Facebook.com/BostonCatholic, +Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston (Google+)

Personal: Bettnet.com ,@bettnet (twitter), Facebook.com/dbettinelli,  (blog), Bettnet.com/+ (Google+)

Short Bio: Domenico Bettinelli, Jr. is the founding Creative Director of the New Media Office. Previously, he worked in development for the Archdiocese and before that was Editor of Catholic World Report magazine. In 1996, he helped create Catholic World News, the first Catholic online news service. In 2001, he created one of the first identifiably Catholic blogs, Bettnet.com. He has a degree in Catholic theology from Franciscan University of Steubenville. He is married to Melanie. They have four children and live in Holbrook, where they are members of St. Joseph Parish.

Recommended resources:

www.internettoolboxforchurches.com